<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasts listened to more on PC than iPod</title>
	<link>http://blog.easyipod.co.uk/podcasts-listened-to-more-on-pc-than-ipod/general-news/187</link>
	<description>The exclusive blog for www.easyishop.co.uk</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Podcasts listened to more on PC than iPod by: Stephen D</title>
		<link>http://blog.easyipod.co.uk/podcasts-listened-to-more-on-pc-than-ipod/general-news/187#comment-1352</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.easyipod.co.uk/podcasts-listened-to-more-on-pc-than-ipod/general-news/187#comment-1352</guid>
					<description>That is such a stupid piece of research - all podcasts have to go to a computer first - the user then chooses whether to upload it to the iPod ect or not - what possible conclusions can be drawn from this? People prefer to listen to a podcast in one step rather than taking two? Or they are happier to use PC speakers rather than using earphones?  DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That is such a stupid piece of research - all podcasts have to go to a computer first - the user then chooses whether to upload it to the iPod ect or not - what possible conclusions can be drawn from this? People prefer to listen to a podcast in one step rather than taking two? Or they are happier to use PC speakers rather than using earphones?  DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
